The Justice Game – Truth Essay

How does the pursuance and defense each represent the equity? Values and attitudes of the participants? Robertsons values and histrionics of the mightyfulness? Truth mint be correspond in differing ways according to the values and attitudes of the persona whose facsimile of justness is being expressed. Throughout Geoffrey Robertsons The Justice gage the responder is win all over to accept the composers representation of impartiality with the utilisation of composition techniques such as the short bosh structure, Robertsons social agency, divers(a) language techniques, symbolism and the subroutine of examples and quotations to back up Robertsons contentions.The spot on lawfulness held by the other participants in each political campaign is until now also include. The term justice refers to accurately placing information in accordance with situation or reality. The truth in The Justice biz is essentially about revealing to its subscribers What is kept fro m the public, and what the public wish to be kept from. Each solecism was chosen by Robertson to provide polar representations of the truth based on antithetic values and attitudes. The short report card structure allows many themes relevant to gild to be coherently included in one text.Through the eyes of Robertson the great unwashed have the chance to see the truth in these highly publicised cases from the vista of a learned and involved man. Robertson is assumed to be a genuine reservoir of truth by the average reader, because he is a celebrated attorney and has been chosen to represent people as high profiled as the Princess of Wales. The musical style and format of the text represent plastered qualities to the reader, along with the social status of Robertson which in turn, act to convince them that what is writ tenner is true(a). The Trials of Oz is a case that took place in 1971 against Richard Neville, Jim Anderson, and Felix Dennis, editors of the infamous unde rground Oz magazine. The controversy arose from the quests perspective that the material in the magazine was detrimental and corruptive to society of that time. In particular the comic strip satirizing Rupert the Bear elaborately renamed Rupert the B ar, and a fine advertisement titled Suck. The prosecution represents the truth through a traditional method of attack that shows Learys Victorian image.Brian Leary representing the prosecution draws on the control panels traditional background to straighten out them empathize with his perspective of the truth that the Oz magazine was an indecent article. Leary discredits witnesses with his insinuatingly effective cross- examinations. The defense and Oz magazine were mark as the preference society in order to alienate them in the jurys mind, and to make the jury feel unwilling to depart to the defence and therefor the alternative society.The prosecution feels that the alternative society has no respect for the accepted values and attitudes of normal society. The alternative society is described to worship sex until it reaches the ultimate stage of tush on the streets. This is an example of the generalisations made which pose the alternative society as unattractive and distasteful to be a part of. The Defence on the other hand, use high profiled witnesses and statistics, such as the pornography lot conducted on married couples, to highlight the harmless nature of the Oz magazine.John Mortimer representing the defence, undermines the serious- tending(p)ness of the outpouring through his permissive attitude towards life. The defence lightens the atmosphere with ludicrous jokes such as when Leary asked Dixon how old he thought Rupert the Bargon was, he replied Im non an expert in determining Bears ages perhaps you be more familiar in the field? This aids in reducing the seriousness of the accusations. He trivialises the magazine by referring to it as a schoolboy prank or cheeky criticism, and thus cons iderably plays bring down the charges.The language technique of using humour makes the whole trial bet as a joke. The composer states that Perhaps the best thing about Oz is that they only when dont have trials like that anymore. Robertsons representation of the truth toward the Oz magazine is that he sees it as cheeky unless not harmful. Experts are used as witnesses to portray the defendants as essentially guiltless, and to make the prosecutions arguments appear groundless, based on confusion tactics and unreality.Robertson always undermines and discredits most people who hold power in the establishment. This is represented in his ridicule of Judge Argyle as he points out the mistakes he made when sentencing, and how he portrays judge Argyle as narrow minded and unreasonable. The composer shows himself as an advocate of new society through his belief that the trial is merely a collision of cultural incomprehension, with the older generation symbolised by Judge Argyle, being unable to understand the revolutionary notions held by the jr. generation.This is shown by his constant criticism of the judge, whose inability to comprehend contemporary tongue and general knowledge is stressed repeatedly, effectively conveyed through the misunderstanding of the diction right on and the sexual act of cunnilingus. Robertson aligns himself with the values of his buns audience, the working class and lower middle classes, allowing the reader to identify with him. wherefore the reader is content to allow Robertson to represent their opinions as they are win over that the authors representation of truth is correct, although being subjected to other representations of the truth as well.Robertsons main argument in Michael X on Death lyric was that the finish penalty was, in itself, a cruel and unusual penalization Robertsons representation of truth in this instance is that prolonged get going on remainder row amounted to severity and was contrary to the Bill o f Rights. Robertson, a Civil Libertarian, trusts that there is only hope in the courts and not in politics, and that his strong stances on sympatheticity can only be achieved through battling the government to change the law, in court.Robertson states that he is passionately in spare of the incorporation into British law, the European Convention on human rights. This fact and Michaels ordeal are what brought about the battle to save death row inmates, that Robertson endured for twenty- years. Robertson repeatedly reminds the reader of the longevity of his battle to abolish peachy penalty in commonwealth countries, which reflects his slightly egotistical nature but also symbolically reminds the reader of the many years spent by inmates on death row.As a young lawyer when Robertson took up this case, he was highly idealist and his interest in the case was genuine. The prosecution refutes the defences statement that prolonged stay on death row is brutal arguing that in many case s the reason for long delays before execution of instruments are the self- induced delays of last minute desperate appeals on their behalf from their lawyers. The prosecution continues that sinless people were never convicted and All murder convictions are approved by the finest judges in the world, and deserved their sentence.The defence represents the truth of capital punishment being unbecoming to human dignity. They evoke emotion and sympathy from the reader and the courts through phrasing death with wrong such as human sacrifice and using emotive language. Robertson aids this cause through colourful analogies such as comparing his visit to see Michael X to that of seeing the rarest species of animal at the zoo. The defence believes that although their immediate client Michael X cannot be saved, they are helping countries through the progression of their constitutions.Robertson presents this case in a very biased manor, creating a strong sympathetic feeling in the reader t owards the solemn, vulnerable member of the living dead Michael X. Throughout the story Michael X is referred to as simply Michael establishing that the inmate is a changed man. Robertson presents Michael X to be the victim and the state to be the villain, which once again portrays his distain for authority explicit in his other stories. A detailed description of the process of execution is given which adds to Robertsons view that capital punishment goes against the European conventions of humanity.The aversion committed by Michael X is only referred to a whole ten pages into the story, after creating a sense of innocence to the voice of Michael, and the crime itself is not given any real importance by Robertson. This is a technique used to portray other truths as such, whilst convincing the reader to set to Robertsons representation of the truth and not letting the reader believe the alternate truth. All the descriptions of death row are negative, discriminatory by Robertsons o pposition to capital punishment.As the subject offspring is a serious one dealing with capital punishment, Robertson has chosen the use of an objective and serious footfall of voice in contrast to The Trials of Oz which is presented in a more light- hearted inflect to emphasise the undermining of the charges. The first person yarn structure allows the truth to be told from a different and more reliable source than The Trials of Oz as Robertson is more learned in this case, as he was personally involved.This however, brings about the technique of employing one- sided story telling to build the character of Michael X as a victim of the out dated death row execution system, and emphasises that He was a different man tetrad years on. Through the technique of careful positioning of facts, Robertson persuades the reader to retain with his representation of the truth. He appeals to the readers humanity and convinces them to sympathise with Michael X, by present the inhumanity and immorality of the execution system through illustrations of exaggerated cruelty of the ghoulish rituals performed before and during execution.In Sylvia Plaths poem The Mirror, the personification of the reverberate stands as the objective endorser of truth. The mirror tells the responder that it is not cruel, only truthful, that it has no other purpose but to reflect the physical fashion of the female body, as a lake would do. This is expressed through the allegoryical statement Now I am a lake. Personification allows the mirror to make unbiased and exact observations and through these we come to understand the importance of expression to the charr.The woman searches my (mirrors) reaches for what she really is, conveying Plaths representation of the truth that to the woman, her true self is based purely on her external appearance. The mirror describes itself as having no preconceptions allowing it to simply reflect the unbiased reflection of a womans physical appearance, contr asted candles and the moon, which are said to be liars as they cast mellow lights that can distort the reflection from the truth of daylight.Plath metaphorically likens the mirror to The eye of a little god, emphasising the power that it has over the emotional state of the woman who ironically rewards (the mirror) with tears and an agitation of hands acknowledging the importance of the mirror to her, and its faithful reflecting of her true physical appearance. The poem is a comment on societys fixation on image.Plath exposes the truth about aging the resentment and rejection of it, especially through the continuation of the pissing imagery that the mirror asserts that in it the woman has drowned a young girl, and an old woman/ Rises, to devour the ageing woman like a terrible fish. This simile provides a grotesque image of old age. The use of the mirror in the poem is in fact an extended metaphor with the mirror possessing the power to reflect image. The poem endorses the import ance of image that rectifies the truth about oneself as it best sees fit.Unlike The Trials of Oz, The Mirror is not create verbally in a comical and light- hearted tone. It is written in an objective tone of voice as Plath takes on the persona of a mirror to badly describe its value to the woman. Both texts are however, are relatively unsophisticated in their representations of the truth. The meditative essay Southpaw by visual modality Willis, portrays a representation by a side-lined left- hander that left handed people are discriminated against by contemporary society. The persona sees himself as discriminated against because he is a southpaw.The essay is light- hearted and satirical, but nonetheless the left- handers are forced to live in a world designed for right- handers. A series of seriocomic anecdotes are included to portray the disadvantages faced by the left- handed dependant group. The accepted values and attitudes of the right- handed society include the acce ptance of the downgrading of the dependant group, as common phrases used in everyday deliverance are coined with an underlying prejudice against the left side.Colloquial phrases among Australians such as shell be right are used as examples within this reflective essay to support the notion that left- handers are discriminated against by the Right handers, as members of the dominant group. In this phrase however, the literal meaning of the word right is to be correct, not the right side as Willis has understood it. This shows that the imperative truth in the Australian phrase has been distorted to reveal Willis representation of the truth.The literal meanings of the word right in Latin and French, is however included to reiterate Willis perspective that right- handers are able to enjoy the sub- aware discrimination of left- handers. The word right means endowed with dexterity in Latin, and adroit and experts in the use of hand and mind in French. Willis takes his case of accusin g society of discriminating against left- handers by bringing in Christian religious connotations.He describes right- handers as sit(ting) at the right hand of theology whilst exclaiming that those who sit on the left are cursed into the unceasing fire. These expressions are once again taken out of the context in which they are used, and are exploited by Willis to aid in his representation of the truth. The biased qualities seen in this reflective essay is not unlike Michael X on Death Row as both Robertson and Willis effort to distort the absolute truth into evidence to support their own representations of the truth.The tone of voice however differs greatly as Southpaw is written in a more comical manor than the serious tone of Michael X on Death Row. Through the study of the above named texts, different representations of the truth can be identified with depending on the influence of certain values and attitudes possessed by the participants involved with the text. It is show n that the absolute truth, in terms of information that is accurately placed in accordance with fact or reality, can be manipulated and twisted by the composer in order to portray their representation of the truth.A certain enlightenment is provided in dealing with prejudiced and biased material, as persuasive techniques employed by the composers are also revealed. As a Civil Libertarian, Robertson passionately believes that the Law can humble the most powerful governments and wealthy private litigants such as the Princess of Wales. The law permits justice, meaning the side with the best case, to be gained through fit opportunity. Robertson presents his representation of the truth about what he elaborately coins The Justice Game.