99 Cent V. Lancaster Redevelopment Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

99 centime V. Lancaster Redevelopment - Coursework ExampleThe loss of Costco would result in the loss of over $400,000 generated from sales tax each year. The 99 Cent Only computer memory only generated about $40,000. Lancaster well-tried to use the power of eminent domain to obtain the property of the 99 Cent Only store but was sued - and lost.Similar to the decision of the Supreme Court, I would have ruled in favor of 99 Cent Only Stores. While laws would have allowed Lancaster Redevelopment Agency to remove and redevelop a slummy, blighted area, the 99 Cent Only Store was not found to be blighted. Under Health & Safety principle 33030, a blighted area is one which is 80% urbanized, and a physical and economical liability which cannot be reversed or alleviated without redevelopment. (Fergusson, 2005). The Fifth Amendment protects property owners from having their property taken by the government unless it is for macrocosm use. It seems to me that if Lancaster seized the prope rty from 99 Cent Only Stores, it would be for Costcos use (so it could expand) and for Lancasters own use (so it could obtain great revenue from sales tax).However, if brought to court today, after the decision made by the Supreme Court in 2005 regarding the case of Kelo v. City of New London, the result of the 99 Cent Only case would quite promising be different.